> On Jun 7, 2021, at 9:39 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 8:09 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks. Me again.
>>>
>>> A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
>>> concatenation. At
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 8:09 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> > On Jun 7, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks. Me again.
> >
> > A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
> > concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool,
> > l
> On Jun 7, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> Hi folks. Me again.
>
> A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
> concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool, like,
> but we need partial function application first so that the synt
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Eugene Leonovich wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:03 PM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks. Me again.
> >
> > A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
> > concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool,
> > lik
On 07.06.2021 at 13:32, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Removing the centralized PECL builder and dependency manager would most
> likely lead to a huge regression in the support and manageability. Right now
> there's one place pecl.php.net to go for the non core extension builds and
> any dependencies a
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:03 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> Hi folks. Me again.
>
> A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
> concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool,
> like, but we need partial function application first so that the syntax for
Den 2021-06-02 kl. 22:16, skrev Mike Schinkel:
On Jun 2, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
Hi folks. After much off-list discussion, iteration, and consideration, we
have a new draft of PFA ready for review.
The URL is the same:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application
Den 2021-06-07 kl. 21:00, skrev Larry Garfield:
Hi folks. Me again.
A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function concatenation. At the
time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool, like, but we need partial function
application first so that the syntax for callables is
Hi folks. Me again.
A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool, like,
but we need partial function application first so that the syntax for callables
isn't so crappy."
The PFA RFC is winding down now
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:51 PM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> > Thank you for the detailed analysis in the rationale section. I am,
> > however, still skeptical of this approach, for a couple of reasons.
> >
> > 1. This does appear to address the
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 3:02 PM Nikita Popov
Regarding dependencies, does this mean that extensions should also build
> DLLs for dependency libraries themselves? Are there any concerns about
> different extensions building different versions of the same library, or
> similar?
>
This the very reason
On 07-06-2021 12:40, Nikita Popov wrote:
> I think that not adding new procedural mirror APIs is pretty
> uncontroversial at this point. I think one open question is regarding API
> additions to existing classes with a mirror API -- should we keep adding
> procedural functions in that case?
I g
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikita Popov
> Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 1:07 PM
> To: Christoph M. Becker
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 8.1 and PECL ext builds for Windows
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:58 AM Christoph M. Becker
>
> wrote:
>
> > On 07.06.2021 at
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:58 AM Christoph M. Becker
wrote:
> On 07.06.2021 at 10:02, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:26 PM Christoph M. Becker
> > wrote:
>
> >> on Tuesday, PHP 8.1.0alpha1 is supposed to be tagged, and since I don't
> >> have the capacity to do these builds ma
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:11 PM Timon de Groot wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to present my RFC for adding the indent parameter to the
> json_encode function:
>https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_encode_indentation
>
> The `string|int $indent = 4` parameter adds the ability to specify the
> ind
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:28 PM Mel Dafert wrote:
> Hi internals,
> After the RFC to add IntlDatePatternGenerator () was accepted, it was
> brought up that the duplication of
> procedural and OO style was not necessarily/useful anymore.
> This already has some (old) precedent - in 2012, UConverter
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:14 AM tyson andre
wrote:
> Hi Kamil,
>
> > I have reworked the RFC based on some feedback. The improved RFC now will
> > hold 2 votes. One vote to decide whether the behaviour should be
> deprecated
> > from false, and another from null.
> >
> > If there are no objection
Hj Remi! :)
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 3:01 PM Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 04/06/2021 à 16:36, Ben Morss via internals a écrit :
>
> > ... I created a PR to propagate libgd's AVIF
> > support into PHP's bundled gd fork...
>
> Does it really make sense to keep maintaining this fork ?
>
> Having to maintain
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:51 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, at 10:19 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
> >
> > This proposal is similar to the
> > https://wi
On 07.06.2021 at 10:02, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:26 PM Christoph M. Becker
> wrote:
>> on Tuesday, PHP 8.1.0alpha1 is supposed to be tagged, and since I don't
>> have the capacity to do these builds manually (as currently done with
>> the PHP 8.0 builds), I've set up an aut
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:01 AM Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 04/06/2021 à 16:36, Ben Morss via internals a écrit :
>
> > ... I created a PR to propagate libgd's AVIF
> > support into PHP's bundled gd fork...
>
> Does it really make sense to keep maintaining this fork ?
>
> Having to maintain 2 (quite)
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:26 PM Christoph M. Becker
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> on Tuesday, PHP 8.1.0alpha1 is supposed to be tagged, and since I don't
> have the capacity to do these builds manually (as currently done with
> the PHP 8.0 builds), I've set up an automation which does the builds on
> GH ac
Le 04/06/2021 à 16:36, Ben Morss via internals a écrit :
... I created a PR to propagate libgd's AVIF
support into PHP's bundled gd fork...
Does it really make sense to keep maintaining this fork ?
Having to maintain 2 (quite) different code and picking
piece from one to other seems a waste o
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 11:09 PM Ayesh Karunaratne wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> Thank you for opening this PR and the discussion. With the wide
> availability of AVIF/AV1 support in browsers, I think this will fit
> nicely.
>
Yes, this looks like a reasonable addition. Effectively this is just a sync
with
24 matches
Mail list logo
