Hi Stephen
On 19/09/2023 09:58, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Sep 2023, at 14:30, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 9/19/23 08:35, Stephen Reay wrote:
>>> Regarding the private constructor: I understand the issue with the *old*
>>> class being confusing - but your new class doesn't
Hi Stephen
On 19/09/2023 08:35, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
>> On 19 Sep 2023, at 01:00, Niels Dossche
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niels
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>
> (Resending with history removed due to
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023, at 7:30 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 9/19/23 08:35, Stephen Reay wrote:
>> Regarding the private constructor: I understand the issue with the *old*
>> class being confusing - but your new class doesn't have that issue, because
>> there are no "loadXXX" methods: as
> On 19 Sep 2023, at 14:30, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 9/19/23 08:35, Stephen Reay wrote:
>> Regarding the private constructor: I understand the issue with the *old*
>> class being confusing - but your new class doesn't have that issue, because
>> there are no "loadXXX" methods: as
Hi
On 9/19/23 08:35, Stephen Reay wrote:
Regarding the private constructor: I understand the issue with the *old* class being
confusing - but your new class doesn't have that issue, because there are no
"loadXXX" methods: as you said, if you're loading an existing document, you're
forced to
> On 19 Sep 2023, at 01:00, Niels Dossche
>
> Cheers
> Niels
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
(Resending with history removed due to apparent size limit)
Hi Niels,
Obviously, a method with different
