>
> just like the constructor accepts
> new DateTime("@0.123456"); // 1970-01-01 00:00:00.123456
> new DateTime("@".microtime(true));
>
> IMO setTimestamp should accept the same:
> $dt->setTimestamp(0.123456); // 1970-01-01 00:00:00.123456
> $dt->setTimestamp(microtime(true));
>
> Can we change set
Hello Internals,
Today, I was working with a library (ReVolt) that throws if a callback
returns something other than null (why it doesn't ignore the value, I
don't know, maybe I'll file an issue). I discovered the topic of this
email after trying to be simple:
EventLoop::repeat($pingInterval, $cl
just like the constructor accepts
new DateTime("@0.123456"); // 1970-01-01 00:00:00.123456
new DateTime("@".microtime(true));
IMO setTimestamp should accept the same:
$dt->setTimestamp(0.123456); // 1970-01-01 00:00:00.123456
$dt->setTimestamp(microtime(true));
Can we change setTimestamp to accep
Hi internals
I'm starting the vote on my RFC "Opt-in DOM spec-compliance".
Voting will run until the 27th of February 21:00 GMT+1.
RFC link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/opt_in_dom_spec_compliance
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/122169
Pre-RFC pitch: https://externals.io/message/122048
Kind
(We're going to need to move the lists servers, and just trying to
figure out how email gets currently delivered)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php