-1. Keep the query functions and return FALSE. No need to unnecessarily
break b/c for scripts that were just trying to do the right thing by coping
with both possibilities. It's just one more roadblock to PHP 6 adoption.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Andrew Shearer wrote:
Meanwhile, array_get() provides the most-needed functionality
while avoiding
the issues that prevented ifsetor's acceptance.
Aside from lack of BC hacks what is the issue? I remember some
fussing about the name
On 9/12/07, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Robert,
yeah ifsetor if much better than the @-?: combination. But for 5.3 that
would be all we could do. For 6 and in the long run we might do a real
ifsetor. If ever we could come to a consensus... and no i don't really
like
to
;
}
}
}
(This version turned in the fastest times out of several variants.
Passing $arr by reference or attempting to return the result by
reference had a huge negative impact, and using the ternary ? :
operator instead of the if/else was slightly slower.)
===
--
Andrew Shearer
http://ashearer.com
to return the result by
reference had a huge negative impact, and using the ternary ? :
operator instead of the if/else was slightly slower.)
===
--
Andrew Shearer
http://ashearer.com/
Best regards,
Marcus
Andrew Shearer
http://ashearer.com/
Best regards,
Marcus
turned in the fastest times out of several variants.
Passing $arr by reference or attempting to return the result by
reference had a huge negative impact, and using the ternary ? :
operator instead of the if/else was slightly slower.)
===
--
Andrew Shearer
http://ashearer.com
Let me try that again with the files attached. I'll leave out the
full original proposal this time.
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:12 PM, Andrew Shearer wrote:
Here's a patch against HEAD that implements the array_get function
previously suggested on this list. I also attached a test suite
;
}
}
}
(This version turned in the fastest times out of several variants.
Passing $arr by reference or attempting to return the result by
reference had a huge negative impact, and using the ternary ? :
operator instead of the if/else was slightly slower.)
===
--
Andrew Shearer
http
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Andrew Shearer wrote:
Let me try that again with the files attached. I'll leave out the
full original proposal this time.
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:12 PM, Andrew Shearer wrote:
Here's a patch against HEAD that implements the array_get function
previously suggested
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:31 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 11.09.2007 02:12, Andrew Shearer wrote:
Here's a patch against HEAD that implements the array_get function
previously suggested on this list. I also attached a test suite,
which should go in ext/standard/tests/array/array_get.phpt. Feedback
in the fastest times out of several variants.
Passing $arr by reference or attempting to return the result by
reference had a huge negative impact, and using the ternary ? :
operator instead of the if/else was slightly slower.)
Comments?
--
Andrew Shearer
http://ashearer.com/
--
PHP
11 matches
Mail list logo
