Gabriel,
Thank you and the internals team for their hard work on this. As
someone from the periphery I am excited about the release.
Eliot
[2nd try]
On 25.11.20 14:41, Gabriel Caruso wrote:
> Hello internals!
>
> I’d like to take a moment to reflect what will happen tomorrow with all of
> you
What helps me when I spread the word is if there is a simple page that
will look good on a retweet/FB/LinkedIn page, with a couple of release
highlights. It doesn't need to be fancy, but something that flashes a
big PHP 8.0 logo or some such as the image as part of the preview would
be quite nice.
Hi the peanut gallery...
I can't say that blacklist/whitelist -> something else is a meaningless
change. The challenge we as technologists (nevermind our color) have is
that we don't really have good guidance from psychologists and
sociologists (I know, I tried chasing down those links last year
Hi everyone,
Following up on this work, I am pleased to say that the code is stable
and code complete. In discussions with this group and various
maintainers, it seems that people don't see the need for a VOTE on this
work. Therefore, unless there is an objection, I will work with the
maintainer
[2nd try, this time with proper etiquette]
Hi Rowan and Larry and others,
On 21.05.20 23:53, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> I would like to propose that the client advertises HTTP/1.1 in its
> requests by default in PHP 8.0. Users can opt out of this behaviour
> in a fully backwards- and forwards-comp
Dan, thanks. Please see below.
On 18.05.20 13:49, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 10:55, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> there is an open question as
>> to whether it should be an RFC
> I don't think it should be.
>
> The questions and problems related to crypto
flags argument, most
particularly CMS_STREAM. Because each of the arguments are files, I am
wondering if I should reduce the coding complexity and just produce an
error on that flag. I am going to ask the OpenSSL community about this
as well.
Eliot
On 13.05.20 21:54, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Just
Just to follow up on the earlier thread
(https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/110127), I've done my best to
create an RFC for the CMS support additions. I would welcome any
comments or suggestions. If folk don't want it to go through the whole
RFC process, that's fine by me. Otherwise, it's th
Hi!
On 12.05.20 17:10, G. P. B. wrote:
> Does this really require an RFC?
> This seems like just exposing some underlying functionality from OpenSSL
> to userland which I wouldn't have expected to need an RFC to be added.
Whether or not you wish to use the full process (voting and all) is not
som
Hi everyone,
I am new to the PHP development process, so please forgive me if I have
this wrong.
In PR #5251[1] I’ve created OpenSSL CMS functions that are nearly direct
analogues to the openssl PKCS#7 functions. Cryptographic Message Syntax
is defined in RFC 5652[2], and is a follow-on to PKCS#
10 matches
Mail list logo
