will fail if you pass only one:
https://3v4l.org/tLO0s. I wonder what the correct version of the pipe
example (the one that uses strings as callbacks) would look like, given
that you have to pass two arguments for explode()?
--
Thank you and best regards,
Eugene Leonovich
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 5:14 PM Mark Randall wrote:
> On 07/05/2019 15:22, Gert wrote:
> > My idea, extremely summarized, would be to take the functions that
> > return false/null when they 'error', and instead make them actually
> > throw an error.
>
> It comes up on various discussion forums eve
: https://gist.github.com/rybakit/bb551f962b706a9e08c995cf5ed9762f
--
Thank you and best regards,
Eugene Leonovich
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:45 PM Zeev Suraski wrote:
> One our hopes in opening this up for comments, is that people would
> actually try the code themselves and experiment with it - well beyond what
> we can do ourselves.
>
Is there a docker image with JIT support that people can try?
s/maps:
https://github.com/rybakit/msgpack.php/blob/master/src/Packer.php#L112-L114
--
Thank you and best regards,
Eugene Leonovich
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Михаил Востриков <
michael.vostri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I can easier add a new template to e.g. a Laravel
> > project (own parser, own extension, living next to existing blade
> templates)
>
> Your project already has a template engine, and framework has common
I'm a bit confused by the "class" keyword in the syntax ClassName::class.
We already have the magic constant __CLASS__ which does exactly the same
class name resolving, if you refer it within the class.
So why to introduce a new keyword instead of using __CLASS__, like
ClassName::__CLASS__?
Eug
