is mailing list:
>> > List: php-internals
>> > Subject:Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 8.1
>> > From: Nikita Popov
>> > Date: 2021-06-15 12:23:50
>> > Message-ID: CAF+90c8wht+LpERZxj-XuY4sAYek8fH9hH_fc+JVZYg_yiAMpw ()
. (but if there is no actual https links in
the wild, I'm guessing it won't add much value)
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 13:10, Ayesh Karunaratne wrote:
> >
> > S, what's next?
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 18:06, Hans Henrik Bergan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Ayesh thanks
dang, yeah completely missed that, sorry
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 13:14, Tim Starling wrote:
> On 11/10/21 9:33 pm, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> > @Nicolas i hope mediawiki doesn't run on Windows, because that
> > escapeshellarg-replacement you did is not valid for windows.
>
@Nicolas i hope mediawiki doesn't run on Windows, because that
escapeshellarg-replacement you did is not valid for windows.
the code
prints:
echo 'foo && whoami && echo '
and when i run that in bash i get:
C:\Users\hansh>echo 'foo && whoami && echo '
'foo
laptop-1plmku02\hansh
'
- whoami was
S, what's next?
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 18:06, Hans Henrik Bergan
wrote:
> @Ayesh thanks, added support for those url (
> https://github.com/divinity76/git-php-net-redirector/commit/072a579d140a7481e76e95bd8c2d120ee2f71565
> ), also it looks like version numbers got mixed up in you
ee to make
> > something better (also i have no idea how the "p" argument is supposed to
> > be parsed, so i just guessed)
> >
> > it passes "Stanislav Malyshev"'s initial sample url, but it probably
> fails
> > on any other formats, if anyone h
st guessed)
it passes "Stanislav Malyshev"'s initial sample url, but it probably fails
on any other formats, if anyone has test urls, share em
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 08:38, Hans Henrik Bergan
wrote:
> >So who's going to work on it? Doesn't make sense to have 5 people work
> > on
Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 08:01, Andreas Heigl wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> On 04.10.21 07:52, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> > there's also plenty of broken links on reddit to git.php.net , ref
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=git.php.net+site%3Areddit.com
> >
> > it wouldn't
there's also plenty of broken links on reddit to git.php.net , ref
https://www.google.com/search?q=git.php.net+site%3Areddit.com
it wouldn't be hard to set up a redirector parsing commit ids out of the
url and redirecting to github,
+1 from me.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 07:04, Stanislav Malyshev
>What use-case does that serve?
if some country want to change their timezone for whatever reason, to some
timezone that didn't exist previously, could happen at any time really
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 13:32, Hans Henrik Bergan
wrote:
> > What use-case does that serve?
>
> if so
WSL1 or WSL2? afaik they have significant performance differences, and we
should only consider WSL2 as WSL1 is being deprecated afaik
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 12:31, Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> > It would be great if someone on
> Windows and macos could repeat this experiment
>
> I ran this on Windows
PS i've seen *HORRIBLE* fs performance for php-running-on-windows,
where the same filesystem operations on the same files took like 5 seconds
on linux-running-on-vmware-on-laptop-running-windows-10, versus several
minutes for the same operation on the same laptop on windows 10 directly..
for
well today you can do
foreach($it as &$value){...} unset($value);
- which is pretty close, but it will break with
$value="initial";foreach($it as &$value){...}unset($value); echo $value;
here $value will not be "initial", it will be undefined, however you *CAN*
do
Speaking of, i hope that one day we can support javascript-style let in php
:) like
foreach($it as let &$v){}
but that's a discussion for another thread (and i'm sure it has been
discussed before, i haven't actually checked though)
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 15:23, Hossein Baghayi
wrote:
> On Fri,
+1 from me, and yeah lets not care about that edge case, i hope the edge
gets removed at some point.. (but that's an issue for another thread)
FWIW if attempts at getting it in 8.2 fails, i would welcome another
attempt at this for PHP9
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 15:29, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi
not sure if this message belongs on php-gene...@lists.php.net or
internals@lists.php.net or elsewhere, i'll just try here first and see what
happens,
recently made some tests to check performance of UTF8 validators, and in
that (simple non-comprehensive) test, preg_match() is ~33 times faster
btw why isn't foo.bar=123 decoded to array("foo.bar"=>123); ?
this looks pretty bad to me https://3v4l.org/6Wa23
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 10:29, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 08:18, ignace nyamagana butera
> wrote:
>
> > I read your RFC and I understand the intent in improving the
>
> or doing nothing at all.
>
Sounds good to me.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 16:47, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:45 AM Hans Henrik Bergan
> wrote:
>
>> fwiw i think no self-respecting codebase is depending on an ini-setting
>> being correct fo
fwiw i think no self-respecting codebase is depending on an ini-setting
being correct for the ua in cases where the ua is actually important, so
the breakage should be minimal.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 09:25, Aleksander Machniak wrote:
> On 27.06.2021 08:48, Michael Maroszek wrote:
> > That's
, Craig Francis
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 21:24, Hans Henrik Bergan
> wrote:
>
>> short of a bug in esc_like(), i don't even see the vulnerability issue in
>> that code?
>>
>
>
> Sorry Hans, I copied the wrong diff.
>
> There were only 2 changes fro
short of a bug in esc_like(), i don't even see the vulnerability issue in
that code?
that sanitize call looks like a data corruption issue and i bet it fails to
search for binary data, but i don't see the critical vulnerability?
How is one supposed to use this? like
if(!is_trusted($val)){
$val = htmlentities($str, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML401 | ENT_SUBSTITUTE |
ENT_DISALLOWED, 'UTF-8', true);
}
echo "$val";
(...)
if(!is_trusted($val)){
$val = $mysqli->real_escape_string($val);
}
$mysqli->query("INSERT INTO tbl
15 Jun 2021 at 14:24, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:48 PM Hans Henrik Bergan
> wrote:
>
>> i don't like this part of the RFC:
>>
>> > There's a number of bug reports related to this. From what I understand,
>> the core problem here is not tha
i don't like this part of the RFC:
> There's a number of bug reports related to this. From what I understand,
the core problem here is not that the ISO8601 format is *wrong*, it's just
one of multiple legal ISO-8601 formats. As DateTime formats always refer to
a specific format, not a set of
fwiw this can be implemented in userland, and i bet someone already made a
composer package for it ^^
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 11:20, Karoly Negyesi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering whether $array->map($somefunction) would be possible. I am
> not a C programmer by any stretch but reading
just want to double check, 1.009 will then be an incompatible
cast to int(1), right? because the 0.009 will be lost?
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:41, G. P. B. wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 12:39, G. P. B. wrote:
>
> > Hello internals,
> >
> > It's been a couple of weeks
i would prefer to soft-deprecate them like we did with the mysql_ api,
where they do not generate E_DEPRECATED for quite some time, but the
documentation say
"this function is deprecated, instead use mb_convert_encoding ( $str ,
"UTF-8", "ISO-8859-1" ); or iconv("ISO-8859-1","UTF-8", $str)"
and..
if FWIW if DateTime::__toString() was just
function __toString():string{
return $this->format(\DateTime::RFC3339);
}
i certainly wouldn't complain.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:16, Bruce Weirdan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:07 PM Moritz Friedrich wrote:
>
> > but I’m not too fond of the
BLAKE3 is a very fast cryptographically secure hash algorithm,
when i run this implementation https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/6358
against ext/hash/bench.php on an i7-8565U, it's competing against adler32
in performance, and it's significantly faster than every other
cryptographic hash (~2.6
PASSWORD_THROW_ON_ERROR
password_verify ( string $password , string $hash, int $flags = 0 ) : bool
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:01, Benjamin Morel
wrote:
> Hi all, thanks for the constructive feedback.
>
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 15:52, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>
> >
> > Gonna be the usual person
FWIW i'm surprised with the lack of ENT_DISALLOWED , personally i use
tohtml(string $str):string{ return htmlentities($str, ENT_QUOTES |
ENT_HTML401 | ENT_SUBSTITUTE | ENT_DISALLOWED, 'UTF-8', true);}
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 12:03, Craig Francis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could htmlspecialchars() use
given that file_put_contents() supports LOCK_EX
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
if this gets rid of a significant amount of implementation complexity
or runtime overhead, i'm all for it, and don't think i've ever seen
code like $GLOBALS = []; before,
given that it's technically a BC break, would have been nice as a
8.0.0 thing, but i hope it's small enough for an 8.x instead
so.. will the imagecreatefromstring() thing be fixed in 8.0.1 or 8.1.0 ?
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 10:57, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 10:21 AM Aimeos | Norbert Sendetzky <
> norb...@aimeos.com> wrote:
>
> > Am 01.12.20 um 18:24 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
> > > On 01.12.2020 at
if i have understood the "as"-suggestion correctly:
$fn = function() as $lambdaOrAnyName {var_dump($lambdaOrAnyName);};
(function() as $lambdaOrAnyName{var_dump($lambdaOrAnyName);})();
then that syntax is fine with me. this is also very close to how it
works in JavaScript (except the "as"
something i'm missing from Javascript is the ability to give names to closures,
this both gives closures the ability to reference themselves, but it
also makes for meaningful stack traces, eg this is legal javascript:
(function TheClosuresLocalName(){console.log(TheClosuresLocalName);
throw new
+1 for ::tokenize()
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
@Levi
> However, I still see CPU related code in get_cpu_features. Are you
> sure you pushed the right thing?
I think it's correct, yes, the problem is ext/hash/blake3/blake3_dispatch.c,
which is just a copypaste of the upstream
est secure hash on the list, for exact
numbers check the PR.
thoughts?
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 21:34, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
>
> i want BLAKE3 hash support in php,
>
> some justifications can be found here https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79492
> primary reasons being that it's a
PR to make it "a constant number of bytes to hash" here:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/6386
.. was bugging me
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
@Christoph M. Becker
haha that's probably it, i guess that long ago PHP didn't have any
non-crypto hash algos,
one of the results read "256MB Windows 2000"
when was the last time someone rolled a 256MB ram windows 2000?
(am rolling some 128MB ram VPS's, but rolling Windows with such
amounts of
@Nikita Popov
> How did you draw the conclusion that non-crypto hashes are not included?
yeah i know they're there when you run them, but if you look at the
benchmarks in the source code, from line 4 - 71, all the non-crypto
hashes are absent there,
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
@Rowan Tommins
not saying this is a good idea or anything, but i just want to point
out that there's another way to do it in
7.4
$object = new class($foo, $foo * 2, $nextBaz) {
public int $foo;
public int $bar;
public int $baz;
public function __construct($foo, $bar, $baz) {
i want BLAKE3 hash support in php,
some justifications can be found here https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79492
primary reasons being that it's a "cryptographically secure hash",
predecessor BLAKE was nearly crowned "SHA3" (SHA3 finalist),
and it's very fast in software,
when i run it against
@Rowan Tommins
>I think I'd prefer to drop the fluent interface (returning void on most
> things, and relevant values on others)
well both approaches has pros and cons,
that said, the sample implementation Sara posted returns $this,
if you (or anyone) feels strongly about it one way or the
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 10:43, Hans Henrik Bergan
> wrote:
>
> > i know this is unrelated to the thread at hand, but am i really
> > supposed to find the email of everyone who has replied to a thread,
> > and add them all manually to cc?
> >
>
>
> Nope, just
i know this is unrelated to the thread at hand, but am i really
supposed to find the email of everyone who has replied to a thread,
and add them all manually to cc? (or is it sufficient to just send it
to intern...@list.php.net ? ) (also funfact, it seems if you regex the
innerHTML after opening
something like
$result = (new HashContext("SHA1"))->update($str1)->update($str2)->final();
(userland sample imp: https://3v4l.org/lXd3u )
I tried asking on the bugtracker ( https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=80221 ) ,
but was told to ask on this mailing list instead.
--
PHP Internals - PHP
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
