personally I like ">>" but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be possible ;)
"Stefan Walk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 16:23:55 you wrote:
Since this affects everybody, it should be opened up to the community,
so,
the internals should put
hould be opened up to the community, so,
the internals should put together several options and then open a poll for
the community to vote on and then use which ever comes out on top.
Cheers
Kelvin
""Steph Fox"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's right.
And not only that.. not all people have access to set things like the include
path themselves, and would have to do it in every script they run using ini_set
().
And just because there's a workaround for a problem, doesn't mean we can't
provide a better soluti
AIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > Kelvin Jones wrote:
> >
> >> include_once realpath(dirname(__FILE__).'/../example.php');
> >
>
> BTW: don't we have __DIR__ by now?
>
>
> --
> Six Offene Systeme GmbH http:/
d of doing:
include_once realpath(dirname(__FILE__).'/../example.php');
As you have to do now, you could do:
include_once relative_path('../example.php');
What do you think?
Regards,
Kelvin
--
PHP Development Internals - Developing the PHP Runtime Mailing List
(http://www.p
