On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Just to let you know about a new RFC for adding autoboxing feature in
> PHP.
> > Look at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/autoboxing .
>
>
> It looks like a very inter
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> prevented. The short background of what I'm doing is serializing
>> backtraces
>> when errors occur so that I can better diagnose bugs my clients report.
>> But
>> when a closure is passed as a function parameter somewhere
Firstly, I'm not here to debate the merits or the how-to of serializing
closures. I'm here to address the current usability issues with how it is
prevented. The short background of what I'm doing is serializing backtraces
when errors occur so that I can better diagnose bugs my clients report. Bu
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 March 2010 10:05:39 pm Eric Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> +1 For shorter release cycles. Shorter release cycles could also allow
> us
> >> to move major releases immedia
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> The challenge of "never use extend" is that simply wrapping classes in
> decorators only goes so far. You can't always maintain interface
> compliance
> if you're nesting decorators, and if you're overriding only one out of a
> dozen
> or t
2009/7/30 Alexey Zakhlestin
> 2009/7/30 Johannes Schlüter :
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> >> What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
> >> instances in array_* functions?
> >> If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
My personal favorite use of Reflection is Class Factories. While this
could be done with:
It seems a little blunt to me, it also doesn't support having a
variable number of arguments to the constructor. I've seen some
pretty egregious hacks to make the above code work with a variable
number of
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about just silently converting newline to '\n' and tab to '\t',
> etc. I mean if you cant put those characters in a string, who will
> notice? or better, just use a single-quoted string.
>
Random programmer here, but I really
On Dec 5, 2007 12:04 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > collision problems that class naming and function naming have. Only
>
> Only if you insist on *not* using the namespaces to solve collision
> problems. For the 1001th time - you can not expect to put all names into
> global
On Dec 4, 2007 10:36 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:26 -0600, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > > 4. What is wrong with simple prefixes in the first place? Both PEAR_*,
> > >Zend_*, ezc*, and ezp* ar
>
> > Unless there is some other way in PHP of restricting where you can run
> > programs from (can't find any),
>
> Why PHP needs to do that ? isnt that part of OS level security ?
There are those of us in shared environments where scripts can't be
run as a single user because the content is ow
On 8/26/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First make sure you understand what safe_mode does, and doesn't do,
> and just how lame it is at what it tried to do, and fails to do, and
> simply cannot do.
I am all for the removal of safe mode in php. I use safe_mode now,
but I patch it
12 matches
Mail list logo
