gt; --Larry Garfield
>
Sorry about the top posting and thank you for your feedback. I'll take that
into account.
I have used Kotlin myself for many years and love how concise the syntax is
there. I'll take a look at other languages and see if I can come up with a
more concise syntax that still feels like PHP.
Else I might try out creating this small RFC first as a good introduction
to the flow, even though it is unlikely to pass.
Best regards
Oliver Nybroe (he/him)
ted or not
(`public function __construct(public int $foo);` vs `public function
__construct(public int $foo)`).
Thank you, these are very valuable points to address in the RFC.
I can definitely feel that there will be some mixed opinions about
semicolon vs no semi colon.
Best regards
Oliver Nybroe (he/
of property access hooks
in 8.4 which is allowed to be defined in the constructor also.
This change would only be a cosmetic change and simplify the userland code
by removing two redundant characters.
This would be my first RFC and I am willing to try and implement it myself.
Best regards
Oliver Nybroe
Hi, I would like to have RFC karma, so I can submit an RFC for a new syntax
for checking not instance of.
Best regards
Oliver Nybroe (he/him)
ough if
this one would be accepted.
> Why not "not" instead? The "!" in front of "i" in "!implements"
Might be my limited knowledge on the subject, but by using `not`, we are
making `not` a reserved keyword, which I think should be done really
carefully.
and AST
and something I should be able to figure out.
What do people think about this? Would love to clarify if needed.
Best regards
Oliver Nybroe (he/him)
