De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo Ohgaki
>
>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> Well, the feature list for PHP7 is not closed yet. I hope new attractive
>>> features will be added soon because, otherwise, it will
>>> be very hard to sell.
Hi all,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Well, the feature list for PHP7 is not closed yet. I hope new attractive
> features will be added soon because, otherwise, it will be very hard to
> sell. And we need attractive features in the first release, not 7.1 or 7.2,
> which
On Jan 11, 2015 1:34 PM, "François Laupretre" wrote:
> Well, the feature list for PHP7 is not closed yet. I hope new attractive
features will be added soon because, otherwise, it will be very hard to
sell. And we need attractive features in the first release, not 7.1 or 7.2,
which will never have
> De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo Ohgaki
>
> I thought there will be 5.7 and didn't pay much attention on this. Slow
> transition is better than too fast.
Slow transition is good, but, sometimes, it is too slow; I don't know if you
remember how much time was
On 10/01/2015 23:45, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
of forthcoming RFCs. If some "evil" BC breaks get to PHP7, then having
5.7 might have been handy, but we've just ruled out this possibility.
We didn't actually - we could resurrect that RFC and have another vote
when the circumstances change.
It'
Hi Andrea,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> I’m actually closing this vote a little late, it should’ve closed a bit
> before 3pm GMT, but I assumed the vote had been opened in the evening. No
> harm done.
>
> The vote on the PHP 5.7 RFC has closed. By 19 votes to 14, the RF
Hi!
> The current PHP7 doesn't have huge BC breaks as far as I can tell, and
> that's why I (and possibly others) have voted "no".
For the record, it's exactly why I voted no too. If we end up having
ones (e.g. a huge BC break looming in the strict types RFC) that may change.
> of forthcoming RF
Hi,
On 08/01/2015 21:28, Andrea Faulds wrote:
The vote on the PHP 5.7 RFC has closed. By 19 votes to 14, the RFC
has been rejected. This means we won’t be having a PHP 5.7 release,
unless another RFC is made and voted on.
I am still convinced that it was premature to open the voting on the 5.7
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> Normally I just reply to [VOTE] threads when a vote ends, but Pierre said
> making a separate thread in future would be a good idea, and I see no real
> harm in it. This way it’ll catch the attention of people who don’t re
Good evening,
Normally I just reply to [VOTE] threads when a vote ends, but Pierre said
making a separate thread in future would be a good idea, and I see no real harm
in it. This way it’ll catch the attention of people who don’t read all replies
to a thread.
I’m actually closing this vote a l
10 matches
Mail list logo
