Hi internals,
After a good round of discussion, I updated the original "abstract final
class" proposal into a "static class" proposal.
However, I kept both patches online so it's up to voters decide which one
it could be implemented.
Patches are now complete and voting phase starts now and will be
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> After a good round of discussion, I updated the original "abstract final
> class" proposal into a "static class" proposal.
> However, I kept both patches online so it's up to
It's part of the history of that RFC, accessible here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class?rev=1417060830
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Florian Margaine
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
> guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi i
Hi,
Le 12 déc. 2014 17:28, "guilhermebla...@gmail.com" <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> It's part of the history of that RFC, accessible here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class?rev=1417060830
>
But then it isn't clear as of right now. What is proposed? The example? The
votes
RFC is updated exposing both possible usages with both explanations.
Hope it doesn't confuse even more.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Florian Margaine
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 12 déc. 2014 17:28, "guilhermebla...@gmail.com" <
> guilhermebla...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > It's part of the histor
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:35 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> RFC is updated exposing both possible usages with both explanations.
> Hope it doesn't confuse even more.
>
>
Perfect! Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Florian Margaine
On 12/12/2014 17:12, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Patches are now complete and voting phase starts now and will be active
until 12/19/2014.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class
Hi,
After speaking about this RFC with other members of AFUP, we would be on
the -1 side for this.
S
Hi Pascal,
I said this earlier, but considering purely namespaced functions and
autoloading is not the same as static classes. Namespaced functions doesn't
have support for variables and that's a huge strike against it and in favor
of static classes.
Cheers,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Pasc
> On 13 Dec 2014, at 00:35, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> RFC is updated exposing both possible usages with both explanations.
> Hope it doesn't confuse even more.
Hi, in your "As static class” example, it doesn’t really demonstrate that you
can omit the “static” modifier from the functi
Hi everyone,
Voting is now closed.
Since this RFC required a 2/3 majority, the result is against the
implementation of this feature in PHP.
RFC is now updated and moved to withdrawn section.
Thanks,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Tjerk Meesters
wrote:
>
> > On 13 Dec 2014, at 00:35, guilher
10 matches
Mail list logo
