Hi Ondřej:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:09:37AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I probably don't know enough about procedures here. But if you know
that the tests are failing, you should move them to XFAIL category,
don't you?
The tests that are expected to fail are marked XFAIL. The two other
of
This is stripped down bug list diff (only + or - lines included)
between *Debian* 5.3.6-13 and 5.3.7-1 (almost same patch list, removed
patches were merged upstream). Ideally the FAILED test list should be
empty, so we (the packagers) would know that we created the regression
in the distribution,
hi Ondrej!
As far I remember, Daniel fixed some of the (numerous) failing
datetime tests. Can you try to give it a run using current 5.3 branche
pls?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
This is stripped down bug list diff (only + or - lines included)
between
Hi!
On 8/22/11 3:27 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Ondrej!
As far I remember, Daniel fixed some of the (numerous) failing
datetime tests. Can you try to give it a run using current 5.3 branche
pls?
We still have tons of failures in DateTime IIRC and that's because of
the buggy three-letter
Hi Stas:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:31:56PM -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
We still have tons of failures in DateTime IIRC and that's because
of the buggy three-letter timezones.
There are bugs with both type 1 (regularly created datetimes) and type 2
(datetimes created using three letter
