So long as that release note clarifies that this patch has NOT yet gone
through the QA cycle and that, therefore, you use it at your own risk; then
I have no objection to that approach.
--Kris
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 04:02, Gustavo Lopes wrote
On 25 February 2012 04:02, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:57:50 +0100, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
>
>>> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
>>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
>>> doesn't even support the latest
On 25 February 2012 00:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> > Again, why? Because they will skip 5.4.0 in production. And 2.4.1 too.
>
> you are missing the fact that many consider testing the new major versions
> and many of them will only start testing PHP 5.4 in combination with
> Apache 2.4
>
> ...
Am 25.02.2012 00:09, schrieb Bostjan Skufca:
> Despite the fact that Apache HTTPD's website says that 2.4.1 "represents
> the best available version of Apache HTTP Server", and that PHP 5.4.0 will
> probably also bear similar notation (guesswork here!), very few (if any!)
> production environment
Despite the fact that Apache HTTPD's website says that 2.4.1 "represents
the best available version of Apache HTTP Server", and that PHP 5.4.0 will
probably also bear similar notation (guesswork here!), very few (if any!)
production environments are going to even bother considering running first
mi
Hi!
no because both PHP 5.4 and Apache 2.4 was devel-versions for a long time
It may be anywhere "for a long time", but it was raised here first time
today, as far as I know. It's too late for 5.4.0, there's no point
talking about it, this ship has sailed.
But for the future, if you (not mea
Am 24.02.2012 20:57, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
> Hi!
>
>> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
>> doesn't even support the latest Apache".
>
> Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) If som
Regardless, I think this part of the conversation is pointless. I
personally couldn't care less whether anybody thinks we're supporting new
Apache builds quickly enough or whose fault it is if the newest one doesn't
make it into the current build. The finger pointing is just a petty
distraction t
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Maybe it just shows that less and less people care about Apache,
We have just taken over another small web hosting company ... first job move all
of the windows/ASP sites on to the local Apache/PHP framework servers so we can
add all the feature the customers have
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 03:11 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
>>
>> I kinda think Apache 2.4 was under development a bit longer than three
>> days, so PHP could reasonably have been expected to know what was
>> coming.
We have been providing 2.3 sup
On 02/24/2012 03:11 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
I kinda think Apache 2.4 was under development a bit longer than three
days, so PHP could reasonably have been expected to know what was
coming.
Maybe it just shows that less and less people care about Apache,
including PHP core developers.
--
These things often tend to move slowly. I'm bewildered that most Linux
repos still use PHP 5.1.
The problem is, this patch has not yet gone through the QA wash cycle.
That takes time. The only way to get it into 5.4.0, therefore, would be to
delay it even further. I needn't remind anybody here
These things often tend to move slowly. I'm bewildered that most Linux
repos still use PHP 5.1.
The problem is, this patch has not yet gone through the QA wash cycle.
That takes time. The only way to get it into 5.4.0, therefore, would be to
delay it even further. I needn't remind anybody here
On 02/24/2012 11:57 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
doesn't even support the latest Apache".
Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) If somebody expects
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:57:50 +0100, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
doesn't even support the latest Apache".
Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :)
[...]
T
Yeah I agree with Stas. I definitely think this is a good idea and should
be included, but since we're already in the RC phase for 5.4.0 and Apache
2.4 is only a few days old, I don't think it's necessary to rush it into
5.4.0 (which has already been delayed far too many times already).
Definitel
I agree with Stas on this one. Certainly not critical and needs some review
while on the trunk.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
>> included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment tha
Hi!
If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
doesn't even support the latest Apache".
Latest Apache is about 3 days old now :) If somebody expects PHP to have
release version supporting new ma
Stas, David,
If you're planning to have a PHP 5.4 RC9, should Apache 2.4 support be
included? This would reduce any negative user sentiment that "PHP 5.4
doesn't even support the latest Apache".
There is a patch attached to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61172
It needs review and wider testin
19 matches
Mail list logo