Andi 2003:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg03896.html
Andi's brain evolves 2007:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117057393530217&w=2
And today I'm still +1.
I really think by looking at some of the examples I worked through with
my original posting in February
And my stance hasn't changed either:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117060700805108&w=2
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Andi 2003:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg03896.html
Andi's brain evolves 2007:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117057393530217&w=2
And today I'
Hello all,
The array() syntax to me screams function call, something that, in my
mind, did not intuitively mean assign an array to a plain ole
variable.
If I can:
$var1 = 5;
why would I need a special function call "array()" to create and
assign an array?
An array is just like any other variab
Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
So as if I understand, you want to change the syntax of array() keyword.
Will you mind to update the changes in all php scripts in the world too?
PS. You can always have your [] in custom patch, but I do not think
it's useful to want it globally changed.
It is not about changing, it is about adding a different way to declare
arrays (the function-style way will remain). The current code base will be
unaffected.
+1 vote from me to add ['x'=>'y']
On Jan 11, 2008 10:05 AM, Lokrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
>
> So as if
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I think almost everyone here agreed it'd benefit them and maybe the ones
> who don't would go through the same process I went through once they get
> used to it J
I don't know about that, I for once find it silly to even try to argue
that [] is a good i
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Antonio Touriño wrote:
> The array() syntax to me screams function call, something that,
You mean just like if(), for(), while(), foreach(), elseif() and... ?
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP I
-1
Now, back to lurking...
==
Richard Black - Senior Consultant
DataVisibility Ltd
Tel. 020 7917 9570
http://www.datavisibility.com/
Registered Office: 212 Picc
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Pierre wrote:
+1 (for the record in this thread :)
-1
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (for the record in this thread :)
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:51:51 -0800, "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andi 2003:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg03896.html
>
>
>
> Andi's brain evolves 2007:
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117057393530217&w=2
>
>
>
> And today I'm still +1.
>
>
+1
--
Ryusuke SEKIYAMA
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 13:18 +0100, Pierre wrote:
> +1 (for the record in this thread :)
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>
--
Patches/Donations: http://pecl.php.net/~jani/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
+1 for (b) FWIW
Cheers!
Mike
-
Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser,
JG125, The Headingley Library,
James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Email:
-1
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Jan 11, 2008 10:30 AM, Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1
>
> Readability degrades quite a lot.
+1 (b)
Readability will only degrade as much as the coder allows it to.
Besides, I don't get the impression that array() is going to
disappear, only that another option is to be
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (b)
Regards,
--
KUBO Atsuhiro e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (b)
If you think foo([]) is not readable, it's simple... don't use it.
Also, JS defines this since its begining and none until today said it
is not readable.
Regards,
On Jan 11, 2008 11:19 AM, Ford, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for (b) FWIW
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike
>
> -
+1
--
Mark Dennehy
-1
Readability degrades quite a lot.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
And my stance hasn't changed either:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117060700805108&w=2
...
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:05 +0200, Lokrain wrote:
> Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
>
> So as if I understand, you want to change the syntax of array() keyword.
> Will you mind to update the changes in all php scripts in the world too?
>
> PS. You can always have your [] in custom patch, but I do not
+1
Best regards
Stephan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (option b)
--
Tullio Andreatta
09:f9:11:02:9d:74:e3:5b:d8:41:56:c5:63:56:88:c0
45:5f:e1:04:22:ca:29:c4:93:3f:95:05:2b:79:2a:b2
Disclaimer: "Please treat this email message in a reasonable way, or we
might get angry" ( http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers )
--
PHP Internals - P
26 matches
Mail list logo
