Hello Andi,
Thursday, February 17, 2005, 8:49:44 PM, you wrote:
> At 08:18 PM 2/17/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Hello internals,
>>
>> before we rush into another version, how about clearing some open issues
>>that were explicitly relayed from 5.0 to 5.1.
>>
>>1) __toString()
>>
>> The
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:26 PM 2/17/2005 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:21:45PM -0800, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yeah I realize it's different but my idea was that if you have
something
> like:
> filter_get(POST, "foo", FILTER_NUMBER) the semantics of this or some
other
>
At 03:26 PM 2/17/2005 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:21:45PM -0800, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yeah I realize it's different but my idea was that if you have something
> like:
> filter_get(POST, "foo", FILTER_NUMBER) the semantics of this or some other
> function could be:
> i
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:21:45PM -0800, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yeah I realize it's different but my idea was that if you have something
> like:
> filter_get(POST, "foo", FILTER_NUMBER) the semantics of this or some other
> function could be:
> if (isset($_POST["foo"]) && is_number(.
>
> I t
Yeah I realize it's different but my idea was that if you have something like:
filter_get(POST, "foo", FILTER_NUMBER) the semantics of this or some other
function could be:
if (isset($_POST["foo"]) && is_number(.
I think in most cases that would do and doesn't require to add/change
opcodes a
At 03:03 PM 2/17/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:49:44 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6) Still need to integrate PDO into the build system. I emailed Wez about
> this. I see this a show stopper for 5.1. Basically I think --with-db should
> build both ext/db a
Hello Andi,
>>4) php 5.1 is aiming to increase performance and security => ifsetor
>>
>> It is nice and easy and fast...only it's name. Well guys come on that's
>> the stupiest reason to reject. The name is selfspeaking, you're all only
>> not so used to its name as you are with foreach for
Hello Andi,
Thursday, February 17, 2005, 8:49:44 PM, you wrote:
> At 08:18 PM 2/17/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Hello internals,
>>
>> before we rush into another version, how about clearing some open issues
>>that were explicitly relayed from 5.0 to 5.1.
>>
>>1) __toString()
>>
>> The
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 08:18 PM 2/17/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >4) php 5.1 is aiming to increase performance and security => ifsetor
>
> It wasn't only the name but also the implementation. Actually, I was hoping
> that the input filter API w
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:49:44 -0800, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6) Still need to integrate PDO into the build system. I emailed Wez about
> this. I see this a show stopper for 5.1. Basically I think --with-db should
> build both ext/db and ext/pd_db.
I already made a start on this la
At 08:18 PM 2/17/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello internals,
before we rush into another version, how about clearing some open issues
that were explicitly relayed from 5.0 to 5.1.
1) __toString()
There was a problem with the Zend engine 2.0 that forced us to drop this
feature. Now that
Marcus Boerger wrote:
4) php 5.1 is aiming to increase performance and security => ifsetor
It is nice and easy and fast...only it's name. Well guys come on that's
the stupiest reason to reject. The name is selfspeaking, you're all only
not so used to its name as you are with foreach for now.
Hello internals,
before we rush into another version, how about clearing some open issues
that were explicitly relayed from 5.0 to 5.1.
1) __toString()
There was a problem with the Zend engine 2.0 that forced us to drop this
feature. Now that we have 2.1 we should check again and readd the
13 matches
Mail list logo
