On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:57:47 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I've updated the wiki page for Closures with objects extension with
things that are in Proposal A with modifications but are not
implemented:
I've updated the wiki page for Closures with objects extension with
things that are in Proposal A with modifications but are not implemented:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension#status_as_of_august_10_2010
I propose an implementation of closures stored in properties used as
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I've updated the wiki page for Closures with objects extension with
things that are in Proposal A with modifications but are not implemented:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension#status_as_of_august_10_2010
I propose an
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:57:47 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I've updated the wiki page for Closures with objects extension with
things that are in Proposal A with modifications but are not
implemented:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
* What about allowing properties with function names as
strings or
array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
being
consistent with local variables?
Well, you cannot do $a = 'phpinfo'; $a(); as
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:37:01 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
* What about allowing properties with function names as
strings or
array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
being
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:37:01 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
* What about allowing properties with function names as
strings or
array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
being