On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:49 AM Andreas Hennings
wrote:
> Hello internals,
> I am picking up an idea that was mentioned by Benjamin Eberlei in the past.
> https://externals.io/message/110217#110395
> (we probably had the idea independently, but Benjamin's is the first
> post where I see it mentio
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 22:45, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 7:34 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >>
> >> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
> >> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 7:34 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>
>> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
>> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do there is allow
>> attributes to opt-in to a callback method via
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:12, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> I've run into this issue in my attribute library as well
> (https://github.com/Crell/AttributeUtils). What I do there is allow
> attributes to opt-in to a callback method via interface. For example:
>
> #[\Attribute]
> class AttribWithNam
On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 15:14, Stephen Reay wrote:
>>
>> (Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained
>> about message size)
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Andreas,
>> >>
>> >> I too have wondered (and I think asked in ro
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 15:14, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
> (Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained about
> message size)
>
>
> >>
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> I too have wondered (and I think asked in room11?) about such a concept.
> >> >From memory the general response
(Resending to the list without all the history because qmail complained about
message size)
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I too have wondered (and I think asked in room11?) about such a concept.
>> >From memory the general response was “just do it in userland with a
>> wrapper” so its good to see
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 05:22, Stephen Reay wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 30 May 2023, at 07:48, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> >
> > Hello internals,
> > I am picking up an idea that was mentioned by Benjamin Eberlei in the past.
> > https://externals.io/message/110217#110395
> > (we probably had the idea indep
> On 30 May 2023, at 07:48, Andreas Hennings wrote:
>
> Hello internals,
> I am picking up an idea that was mentioned by Benjamin Eberlei in the past.
> https://externals.io/message/110217#110395
> (we probably had the idea independently, but Benjamin's is the first
> post where I see it menti
Thanks for the feedback!
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 03:43, Dusk wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2023, at 17:48, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> > Quite often I found myself writing attribute classes that need to fill
> > some default values or do some validation based on the symbol the
> > attribute is attached to.
On May 29, 2023, at 17:48, Andreas Hennings wrote:
> Quite often I found myself writing attribute classes that need to fill
> some default values or do some validation based on the symbol the
> attribute is attached to.
> E.g. a parameter attribute might require a specific type on that
> parameter
Hello internals,
I am picking up an idea that was mentioned by Benjamin Eberlei in the past.
https://externals.io/message/110217#110395
(we probably had the idea independently, but Benjamin's is the first
post where I see it mentioned in the list)
Quite often I found myself writing attribute class
12 matches
Mail list logo
