On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 16:04, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> No disrespect to all the folks (including myself) who had a part in file
> I/O as it exists today, but it *IS* a hot mess. I've sketched out
> redesigns with folks over the years, but I have to be honest that I don't
> have the spoons to
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 1:29 AM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Recently, I realized that the stream_bucket_new() and
> stream_bucket_make_writeable() functions
> create stdClass instances by dynamically adding a "bucket", a "data" and a
> "datalen" property to it.
>
I don't want to stand in the way of
Hi Jakub,
> The only issue that I see that if you migrate the resource to object you
> effectively drop that property which might be a BC break but based on the
> recent RFC results it will happen in PHP 9.0 so it's not such a big issue.
> I think this might be actually an opportunity to
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:14 PM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> I just submitted feedback to the PR but will also mention it here as it's
>> probably more an API thing. The problem that I see is that it combines two
>> distinct things and create quite ugly self reference inside the proposed
>>
Hi Jakub,
I just submitted feedback to the PR but will also mention it here as it's
> probably more an API thing. The problem that I see is that it combines two
> distinct things and create quite ugly self reference inside the proposed
> StreamBucket object. I would prefer we split it and
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 9:29 AM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Recently, I realized that the stream_bucket_new() and
> stream_bucket_make_writeable() functions
> create stdClass instances by dynamically adding a "bucket", a "data" and a
> "datalen" property to it.
>
> A few days ago,
Hi Everyone,
Recently, I realized that the stream_bucket_new() and
stream_bucket_make_writeable() functions
create stdClass instances by dynamically adding a "bucket", a "data" and a
"datalen" property to it.
A few days ago, I submitted a PR which makes the above mentioned functions
return a
