Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-07-06 Thread Sara Golemon
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > I haven't received any direction for what to do here, so I opened this > issue on the libsodium-php repo: > > https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium-php/issues/127 > > If we get a full checklist of consent from every contributor, including

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-07-06 Thread Scott Arciszewski
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > > ​Hi all, > > Towards the end (currently, anyway) of the pull request discussion, a > possible resolution emerges for ext/sodium: https://github.com/php/php- > src/pull/2560#issuecomment-312452732 > > I've never dealt with licensing iss

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-07-02 Thread Scott Arciszewski
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Christopher Jones < christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 15/6/17 10:34 pm, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > >> On Do, 2017-06-15 at 11:06 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, All extens

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-19 Thread Christopher Jones
On 15/6/17 10:34 pm, Johannes Schlüter wrote: On Do, 2017-06-15 at 11:06 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote: On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Hi, All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed (libs may, of course, have different license) Is there any strong rule about this ? O

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-15 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Do, 2017-06-15 at 08:29 -0400, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Nikita Popov > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet > g> wrote: > > > > > > All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed > > > (libs may, of course, have different license) > > >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-15 Thread Fleshgrinder
On 6/13/2017 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Hi, > > All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed > (libs may, of course, have different license) > > Is there any strong rule about this ? > Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extension ? > > Context: see sodium PR > https://github.com/php/php-sr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-15 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Do, 2017-06-15 at 11:06 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed > > (libs may, of course, have different license) > > > > Is there any strong rule about this ? > > Or is it OK to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-15 Thread Sara Golemon
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote: >> All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed >> (libs may, of course, have different license) >> >> Is there any strong rule about this ? >> Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extensio

Re: [PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-15 Thread Nikita Popov
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Hi, > > All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed > (libs may, of course, have different license) > > Is there any strong rule about this ? > Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extension ? > > Context: see sodium PR > https://github.com/

[PHP-DEV] Extensions License

2017-06-12 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed (libs may, of course, have different license) Is there any strong rule about this ? Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extension ? Context: see sodium PR https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2560 IMHO, make sense to have only PHP Licensed ext.