Hi all,
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 17:07, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> Out of 45 approved RFC, 34 would have cleared a 90% bar, 35 would have
> cleared an 85% bar, and 38 would have cleared a 75% bar.
>
> To the best of my recollection, all of the RFCs that generated major storms
> fall in the these 7
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 22:46 -0500, John Bafford wrote:
> So let's say, hypothetically, internals actually, seriously, wants
> newcomers.
Back in the days when I was more active when teaching newcomers
internals in articles and conferences I typically pointed them to
pecl-dev for the first discus
[Apologies for the re-post; I’m re-sending this with a new subject because it’s
really not about the CoC RFC.]
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 19:40, François Laupretre wrote:
>
> If we want to deal with the reasons why people avoid internals, the let's go
> and analyze the problem first ? I will start
