Re: [PHP-DEV] Namespace Question - Simple

2008-09-26 Thread Nathan Rixham
Richard Quadling wrote: 2008/9/26 Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi All, Can anybody answer the following question for me please. Why not follow (exactly) Java's strong static package/namespace system rather than a home grown dynamic namespace system? It works, it's common, logical, robus

Re: [PHP-DEV] Namespace Question - Simple

2008-09-26 Thread Richard Quadling
2008/9/26 Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All, > > Can anybody answer the following question for me please. > > Why not follow (exactly) Java's strong static package/namespace system > rather than a home grown dynamic namespace system? > > It works, it's common, logical, robust, a working m

[PHP-DEV] Namespace Question - Simple

2008-09-26 Thread Nathan Rixham
Hi All, Can anybody answer the following question for me please. Why not follow (exactly) Java's strong static package/namespace system rather than a home grown dynamic namespace system? It works, it's common, logical, robust, a working model to follow, and ties in well with the PHP on Java