> Yes?
>
> I think you possibly misread my email.
Ah! sorry I understood the opposite, that you were wondering about
letting people load extensions from SQL. Great that we are on the same
note :)
> Sorry, I am in too much pain to look at those before the deadline.
> There is always 8.4 https://w
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 11:40, BohwaZ wrote:
>
> I'm sorry to disagree, but changing this would be a bad idea for
> security.
>
> I'm quite sure that I never want users to be able to load any
> extension through SQL, or it would mean trouble :(
>
> So just like in the SQLite3 extension, extension l
> As that means that SQLite extensions can only be loaded through C code
> (not through SQL), and if someone can upload and execute code to your
> server, your server is compromised anyway, having to edit ini files to
> enable extension loading, seems like a bad tradeoff.
I'm sorry to disagree, bu
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 17:25, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>
>> The RFC doesn't specify if `new PDO(...)` changes behavior at all.
>
> That behaviour is not changed at all.
>
>> will PDO still have the postgres methods
>
> Yes, until someone does an
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 17:25, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> The RFC doesn't specify if `new PDO(...)` changes behavior at all.
That behaviour is not changed at all.
> will PDO still have the postgres methods
Yes, until someone does another RFC to deprecate and remove them.
> if someone does [`new
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 1:49 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just giving an update on the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pdo_driver_specific_subclasses RFC as time is
> running out. The RFC text has been updated with the implemented
> subclasses stubs.
The RFC doesn't specify if `new PDO(..
Hi everyone,
Just giving an update on the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pdo_driver_specific_subclasses RFC as time is
running out. The RFC text has been updated with the implemented
subclasses stubs.
There are a few small things to note, and one larger thing:
Marc Bennewitz wrote:
> It would be great
