On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:43 PM Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
> On 06.02.2025 at 20:24, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, at 3:05 AM, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
> >
> >> Are there any plans to upgrade the parser to bypass these limitations?
> >> I remember Nikita shared some thoughts o
On 06.02.2025 at 20:24, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, at 3:05 AM, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
>
>>> Because PHP uses only an LL(1) parser
Actually, we're using an LALR(1) parser; LL(1) is more constrained
(although, personally, I like those for their simplicity).
>> Are there any pla
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, at 3:05 AM, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
> Hi, Larry!
>
> First of all, I'm very excited about your Pattern Matching RFC and
> looking forward to it.
>
>> Because PHP uses only an LL(1) parser
>
> Are there any plans to upgrade the parser to bypass these limitations?
> I remembe
On 2025-02-04 17:31, Larry Garfield wrote:
However, there is a concern that it wouldn't be self-evident to PHP devs, and the
variable binding side should have the extra marker. Ilija has suggested &, as
that's what's used for references, which would result in:
$b = '12';
if ($arr is ['a' =
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 07:35, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the pattern
> matching RFC, which we want to complete before proposing it officially in
> case we run into implementation challenges.
>
> Such as these, on which we'd like feedback on
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 4:30 PM, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 22:16, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> Patterns are deliberately designed as a superset of existing DNF types. You
>> can already have a type of Foo&Bar, so we want the pattern for "instanceof
>> Foo || instanceof Bar" to be
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 22:16, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
> > On 04.02.25 08:51, Rob Landers wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 05:31, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >>> Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the patte
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 3:16 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Patterns are deliberately designed as a superset of existing DNF types.
> You can already have a type of Foo&Bar, so we want the pattern for
> "instanceof Foo || instanceof Bar" to be the same. That means & and |
> for conjunctions is n
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
> On 04.02.25 08:51, Rob Landers wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 05:31, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>> Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the pattern
>>> matching RFC, which we want to complete before proposing it
On 04.02.25 08:51, Rob Landers wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 05:31, Larry Garfield wrote:
Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the
pattern matching RFC, which we want to complete before proposing it
officially in case we run into implementation challenges.
Such as t
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, at 05:31, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the pattern
> matching RFC, which we want to complete before proposing it officially in
> case we run into implementation challenges.
>
> Such as these, on which we'd like feedbac
Hi folks. Ilija is still working on the implementation for the pattern
matching RFC, which we want to complete before proposing it officially in case
we run into implementation challenges.
Such as these, on which we'd like feedback on how to proceed.
## Object property patterns
Consider this
12 matches
Mail list logo
