[PHP-DEV] Namespace and autoloader Re: [PHP-DEV] Questioning the future of PHP

2013-02-04 Thread Ralf Lang
Would that be so hard to distinguish in the parser? If it is, I'd be grateful to know why. We already have it in now. Changing it for cosmetics would break existing code, and I have not yet understood for what benefit? Touching back on what I mentioned earlier about PHP not having an

[PHP-DEV] Questioning the future of PHP

2013-02-03 Thread Matt Wilson
Hello all. I'd like to start by saying that I am by no means an expert on the subject at hand, and my knowledge is limited to pretty much basic C/C++. I have done little more than patch and write ad hoc extensions for PHP in the past. I'm not looking to criticize so much, as I'm just interested

Re: [PHP-DEV] Questioning the future of PHP

2013-02-03 Thread Sanford Whiteman
This is something of a wet dream of mine TMI, my friend. TMI. Anyway... I think your Subject is unnecessarily trolly even if the substance of your post isn't. So maybe you could re-post with a WAS: Questioning... to avoid p'ing off the dev team? If I'm understanding your statement of The

Re: [PHP-DEV] Questioning the future of PHP

2013-02-03 Thread Larry Garfield
On 02/03/2013 08:51 PM, Matt Wilson wrote: Hello all. I'd like to start by saying that I am by no means an expert on the subject at hand, and my knowledge is limited to pretty much basic C/C++. I have done little more than patch and write ad hoc extensions for PHP in the past. I'm not looking

Re: [PHP-DEV] Questioning the future of PHP

2013-02-03 Thread David Muir
We still don't have a way to auto load non class entities. Other than that, PSR-0 does solve the majority of autoload use cases. Cheers, David Sent from my iPhone On 04/02/2013, at 5:18 PM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.com wrote: On 02/03/2013 08:51 PM, Matt Wilson wrote: Hello all.