[PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-04 Thread Michael Wallner
Hi, could the release manager(s) please take a decision on mentioned bug/feature request? Thanks a lot, Mike -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-06 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! On 10/4/11 6:12 PM, Michael Wallner wrote: Hi, could the release manager(s) please take a decision on mentioned bug/feature request? Could you give a quick summary of what the decision point is just so I won't miss anything scanning through the discussion and these bugs? -- Stanislav Ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-07 Thread Michael Wallner
Hi Stas, On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:26:49 +0200, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Could you give a quick summary of what the decision point is just so I > won't miss anything scanning through the discussion and these bugs? In r299770 [1] I introduced a global var_hash to serialize() so that recursive calls to

Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-15 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! On 10/7/11 2:11 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: So I can only see two solutions: - either disallow serialize/unserialize in __sleep/__wakeup - or revert r299770 So, what is the status of this? I think we better revert it for 5.4 and look for solution that does not mess up existing code. -

Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-17 Thread David Soria Parra
On 2011-10-16, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > On 10/7/11 2:11 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: >> So I can only see two solutions: >> - either disallow serialize/unserialize in __sleep/__wakeup >> - or revert r299770 > > So, what is the status of this? I think we better revert it for 5.4 and > look

Re: [PHP-DEV] RM decision on BUG #55801 / FR #36424

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Wallner
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:06:19 -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > So, what is the status of this? I think we better revert it for 5.4 and > look for solution that does not mess up existing code. Hi there! Yes, I received your mails, sorry for being quiet! I cooked up a patch which uses clean