hi,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
That's the one where conversion int string for serialization was
developed. It came into 5.5 with this patches (the originally proposed
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
That's the one where conversion int string for serialization was
developed. It came into 5.5 with this patches (the originally proposed
patch
On Jun 10, 2013 1:24 PM, Etienne Kneuss col...@php.net wrote:
So if I understand correctly var_dump now indicates a different type than
what accessing the property returns?
Even if the change itself does not constitute a big BC break, this
behavior is confusing and seems like a big no-no
Hi Etienne,
On Mon, June 10, 2013 13:24, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Gustavo Lopes
glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200, Derick Rethans der...@php.net
wrote:
That's the one where conversion int string for serialization was
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Anatol Belski a...@php.net wrote:
Hi Etienne,
On Mon, June 10, 2013 13:24, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Gustavo Lopes
glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200, Derick Rethans der...@php.net
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2013 1:24 PM, Etienne Kneuss col...@php.net wrote:
So if I understand correctly var_dump now indicates a different type than
what accessing the property returns?
Even if the change itself does not
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 14:07 +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
I propose we fix the serialization/unserialization crash in a way that
does not affect var_dump.
That was the summary of my message a while back, too. Aside from that I
trust the assessment of extension maintainers.
I want to take this
On Mon, June 10, 2013 14:04, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Anatol Belski a...@php.net wrote:
Hi Etienne,
On Mon, June 10, 2013 13:24, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Gustavo Lopes
glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 14:07 +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
I propose we fix the serialization/unserialization crash in a way that
does not affect var_dump.
That was the summary of my message a while back, too.
Hi!
As I mentioned previously, that small piece is easy fixable, though it
possibly makes that place not portable between 32 and 64 bit. The main
intention is to fix the unserialization crash, which IMHO interleaves this
small deviation.
What you mean by not portable? Different code,
Hi!
Stas, Johannes? We have to fix this crash, in one way or another. The
current patch is good imo.
I'm ok with this in 5.4 but I'd really like to fix the var_dump issue if
possible.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
Hi Stas,
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 10:54 -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Stas, Johannes? We have to fix this crash, in one way or another. The
current patch is good imo.
I'm ok with this in 5.4 but I'd really like to fix the var_dump issue if
possible.
I've reworked the patch before
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It full fills the
requirements described by Derick when we discussed the possible
fixes.
Hi Derick,
On Fri, June 7, 2013 12:45, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It full fills the
requirements
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
On Fri, June 7, 2013 12:45, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It
Hi Derick,
On Fri, June 7, 2013 14:06, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
On Fri, June 7, 2013 12:45, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
That's the one where conversion int string for serialization was
developed. It came into 5.5 with this patches (the originally proposed
patch is still attached to that ticket)
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It full fills the
requirements described by Derick when we discussed the possible fixes.
Unless there are strong objections in the next couple of days, I will
ask Anatol to apply it on Monday. This is
On Jun 6, 2013 6:03 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
The fix for #53437 is around for some time now. It full fills the
requirements described by Derick when we discussed the possible fixes.
Unless there are strong objections in the next
19 matches
Mail list logo
