Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> In the current patch, this does not work and would need another run in
>> the parser.
>
> Couldn't we just stuff it in ZEND_FETCH_CONSTANT? I'm not arguing for
> it, I'm just saying *if* we wanted it...
Even though it's not r
Hi!
> In the current patch, this does not work and would need another run in
> the parser.
Couldn't we just stuff it in ZEND_FETCH_CONSTANT? I'm not arguing for
it, I'm just saying *if* we wanted it...
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 e
Hey Stas,
* Here are the edge cases / implementation details that need a decision:
- $variable::class (should it even be supported?)
I don't see it doing anything useful.
I generally agree.
In the current patch, this does not work and would need another run in
the parser.
- se
Hi!
> * Here are the edge cases / implementation details that need a decision:
>
>- $variable::class (should it even be supported?)
I don't see it doing anything useful.
>- self, static, parent::class not in a class definition
>- self, static, parent::class in a method signature
>
Hi all,
I know there are few edge cases that need to be resolved. What I am
looking for in the RFC/vote is to determine if ::class (as it works in
the PoC patch) has enough acceptance for inclusion in master.
If there is not enough interest in this by the powers that be, or the
feature as c
