hi Derick,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Stas Malyshev wrote:
illegal state was written on the RFC when voting opened, and the RFC
was accepted almost unanimously. As the proposal was accepted as
such, I saw no valid reason not to
: pierre@gmail.com
To: der...@php.net
CC: smalys...@sugarcrm.com; glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt; internals@lists.php.net;
nikita@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Generators
hi Derick,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Stas Malyshev wrote:
illegal state was written on the RFC when voting opened, and the RFC
was accepted almost unanimously. As the proposal was accepted as
such, I saw no valid reason not to merge. In fact, changing the
proposal after it was voted on would be much
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
I think the generators RFC has been discussed thoroughly enough by
now, so I opened the vote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generators#vote
Thanks,
Nikita
The vote ended with 24 in favor and one
- Original message -
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi internals!
I think the generators RFC has been discussed thoroughly enough by
now, so I opened the vote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generators#vote
Thanks,
Nikita
The
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:02:40 +0200, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com
wrote:
The vote ended with 24 in favor and one against. As such the RFC is
accepted.
I've merged Nikita's branch in 53351d0.
As to the exception objection: the behavior of throwing exceptions on
illegal state was
Hi!
illegal state was written on the RFC when voting opened, and the RFC was
accepted almost unanimously. As the proposal was accepted as such, I saw
no valid reason not to merge. In fact, changing the proposal after it was
voted on would be much more objectionable.
I definitely did
