Am 25.08.2012 01:53, schrieb Nikita Popov:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
It's like with any other compound operator: A _real_ reason isn't there. But
saying "It's not worth it" is something I can live with (even if I don't
know how much effort it would take ;)). I
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's like with any other compound operator: A _real_ reason isn't there. But
> saying "It's not worth it" is something I can live with (even if I don't
> know how much effort it would take ;)). I just asked myself: '?:' is (a kind
>
Am 25.08.2012 01:00, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
Hi!
To point that out: I _don't_ want to change the behaviour, which means
| $foo['xy'] ?:= 'bar';
would trigger a notice like
| $foo['xy'] = $foo['xy'] ?: 'bar';
Then I personally don't see much point in it. Saving a couple of
keystrokes IMHO is
Hi!
> To point that out: I _don't_ want to change the behaviour, which means
>
> | $foo['xy'] ?:= 'bar';
>
> would trigger a notice like
>
> | $foo['xy'] = $foo['xy'] ?: 'bar';
Then I personally don't see much point in it. Saving a couple of
keystrokes IMHO is not really worth it.
--
Stanisla
Hi,
Just want to push my thread ^^
Nobody interested? Too stupid? I need to learn C (:X)? Too complicated?
To much impact (on something)? Too less sense? BC? Anything not
mentioned here?
To point that out: I _don't_ want to change the behaviour, which means
| $foo['xy'] ?:= 'bar';
would tr
