On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:45 PM Christoph M. Becker
wrote:
> On 06.02.2019 at 05:42, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > As long as we have a prominent warning about this in our migration guide
> > alerting people to the associated risk in setups where display errors is
> on
> > - I can live with the
On 06.02.2019 at 05:42, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> As long as we have a prominent warning about this in our migration guide
> alerting people to the associated risk in setups where display errors is on
> - I can live with the change as-is. How do we ensure that it doesn't get
> lost in the clutter
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:19 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:55 PM Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:17 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:42 PM Nikita Popov
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to move forward with this change. I think the
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:55 PM Zeev Suraski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:17 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:42 PM Nikita Popov
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'd like to move forward with this change. I think the overall reception
>> here has been positive, although in the
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:17 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:42 PM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to move forward with this change. I think the overall reception
> here has been positive, although in the discussion some other possibilities
> that avoid/reduce the BC
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:42 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
> silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also silences
> fatal errors. As fatal errors also abort request execution, the result will
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:51 AM Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> Nikita Popov wrote:
> > When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
> > silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also silences
> > fatal errors. As fatal errors also abort request
Hi!
> It's always been bizarre to me that @ can silence fatal errors, which
> has no practical application and makes using @ to silence a lower-level
> error potentially hszardous if its targeted function can also produce a
> fatal error.
Yes, silencing something that kills the script is
Hi Nikita,
Nikita Popov wrote:
When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also silences
fatal errors. As fatal errors also abort request execution, the result will
often be a hard to debug white screen of
