On 13.04.23 10:50, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:46, Andreas Heigl wrote:
DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs
DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then
breaks the DKIM
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:46, Andreas Heigl wrote:
DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs
DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then
breaks the DKIM signature which then breaks DMARC ;-)
I
Hey
On 13.04.23 10:38, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM
and DMARC will finally work
Yes, please, but for different reasons:
Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'list-id'
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM
and DMARC will finally work
Yes, please, but for different reasons:
Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'list-id' header
compared to a Subject prefix and not
