It seems I understand what this is about. You want the VM to be
transferable between threads.
Okay, then I have no further questions.
Thank you, Ed
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, at 11:43, Edmond Dantes wrote:
> >
> > So practically speaking, it’s not worth designing around this yet. The
> > engine would need massive adaptation before userland could safely talk
> > about “parallelism.”
> >
>
> I agree. However, this question was raised. Perhaps ther
>
> So practically speaking, it’s not worth designing around this yet. The engine
> would need massive adaptation before userland could safely talk about
> “parallelism.”
>
I agree. However, this question was raised. Perhaps there’s a larger
team of developers working on a new virtual machine fo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, at 09:30, Edmond Dantes wrote:
> But it's not a parallelism.
>
> пт, 24 окт. 2025 г., 09:43 Rob Landers :
>> __
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, at 08:34, Edmond Dantes wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> In the TrueAsync RFC 4 thread, John Bafford raised a question about
But it's not a parallelism.
пт, 24 окт. 2025 г., 09:43 Rob Landers :
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, at 08:34, Edmond Dantes wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> In the TrueAsync RFC 4 thread, John Bafford raised a question about
> parallelism.
> I would like to share my thoughts and highlight this branch
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, at 08:34, Edmond Dantes wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In the TrueAsync RFC 4 thread, John Bafford raised a question about
> parallelism.
> I would like to share my thoughts and highlight this branch of the discussion.
>
> # What is parallelism in the context of coroutines?
