Le samedi 14 novembre 2015, 16:06:14 Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
> Côme, what do you think about my suggestion for 5.6?
I’m gonna do the same thing as for the port=NULL support, only commit this to
5.6.
I’ll push to 7 the notice when using URI+PORT on the other hand.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
2015. nov. 6. 1:07 ezt írta ("Ferenc Kovacs" ):
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Adam Howard
wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it is possible to make everyone happy all the time. I
think this should be kept for a user code fix.
>>
>
> please don't top post on the php.net mailing lists.
> on one h
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Adam Howard wrote:
> I don't think it is possible to make everyone happy all the time. I think
> this should be kept for a user code fix.
>
>
please don't top post on the php.net mailing lists.
on one hand this change doesn't really make any person happy (apart ma
I don't think it is possible to make everyone happy all the time. I think
this should be kept for a user code fix.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >
> >> O
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Heigl wrote:
>>
>> > Am 05.11.15 um 14:14 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>> > [...]
>> > > I would keep the old behavior for 5.6, even if that was un
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Heigl wrote:
>
> > Am 05.11.15 um 14:14 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
> > [...]
> > > I would keep the old behavior for 5.6, even if that was unintended
> nobody
> > > complained about it(so removing it isn't
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Heigl wrote:
> Am 05.11.15 um 14:14 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
> [...]
> > I would keep the old behavior for 5.6, even if that was unintended nobody
> > complained about it(so removing it isn't a bugfix per se), so I see no
> > reason to break userland code wor
Am 05.11.15 um 14:14 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
[...]
> I would keep the old behavior for 5.6, even if that was unintended nobody
> complained about it(so removing it isn't a bugfix per se), so I see no
> reason to break userland code working before in a micro version.
> for PHP-7.0 we can remove the o
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Côme Chilliet wrote:
> Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 18:59:42 Andrea Faulds a écrit :
> > I'd argue this is a regression, documented feature or not. Supporting
> > 'host:port' is not a bug, and this has broken existing code, which micro
> > (x.y.Z) versions are not all
Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 18:59:42 Andrea Faulds a écrit :
> I'd argue this is a regression, documented feature or not. Supporting
> 'host:port' is not a bug, and this has broken existing code, which micro
> (x.y.Z) versions are not allowed to do. It should be fixed ASAP.
So I got two votes agai
Hi Côme,
Côme Chilliet wrote:
The use of ldap_connect(host:port) without ldap:// is not something that is in
the tests, and is not explicitely allowed by our documentation:
http://php.net/manual/en/function.ldap-connect.php
I don't use LDAP, so maybe it's different here, but accepting both
11 matches
Mail list logo
