Hi again,
Andrea Faulds wrote:
I am not sure if I think this is a good idea… for one thing it may not
be necessary to add support in core for this, because you could easily
write a userland Iterator class that wraps a generator-returning closure
and (re-)invokes it for you. If you do it yourse
Hi,
Nikita Popov wrote:
There is a relatively simple (at least conceptually) way to make generators
rewindable: Remember the original arguments of the function, and basically
"re-invoke" it on rewind().
I'm wondering what people think about adding this functionality. I think
the main argument a
