Gwynne Raskind wrote:
On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Just to be sure, is there any consensus on this? I thought I should
use svn merge.
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant bran
On 28.07.2009, at 01:38, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:20 -0400, Gwynne Raskind > wrote:
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from
trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branches.
which I've been following so far.
Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Incorporating the changes and merges across the branches into one
> commit under a sparse-layouted local copy doesn't do the book-keeping
> against svn:mergeinfo. That's why I suppose it is not a good idea.
I don't think a merge will work the way we use branches though.
Incorporating the changes and merges across the branches into one
commit under a sparse-layouted local copy doesn't do the book-keeping
against svn:mergeinfo. That's why I suppose it is not a good idea.
Moriyoshi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:31 P
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:20 -0400, Gwynne Raskind
wrote:
>> README.SVN-RULES says
>>
>>1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from trunk
>> (aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branches.
>>
>> which I've been following so far.
>
> That document is outdated. It'
On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Just to be sure, is there any consensus on this? I thought I should
use svn merge.
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from
trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branches.
which I've be
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:54:53 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Just to be sure, is there any consensus on this? I thought I should
> use svn merge.
README.SVN-RULES says
1. All changes should first go to trunk and then get merged from trunk
(aka MFH'ed) to all other relevant branc
Just to be sure, is there any consensus on this? I thought I should
use svn merge.
Moriyoshi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:30 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> On 2009-07-27, Takeshi Abe wrote:
>> Log:
>> MFH: fixed #48732 (TTF Bounding box wrong for letters below baseline) and
>> #48801 (Problem wit
On 2009-07-27, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Log:
> MFH: fixed #48732 (TTF Bounding box wrong for letters below baseline) and
> #48801 (Problem with imagettfbbox)
please commit the changes to 5.3/5.2 and trunk at once in one changeset
instead of MFH'ing. Thanks
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developmen
