Hello,
On 1/5/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, POSIX locales should not be used either in internal or userland
printf() unless we're using en_US locale.
I agree. This change is unlucky and as far as I can see we fix our
tree instead of restoring the old behaviors. I'm not su
Yes, POSIX locales should not be used either in internal or userland
printf() unless we're using en_US locale.
-Andrei
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:15 AM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Andrei,
I have no idea. :-) It doesn't really affect me personally that I can
think
of, so whatever you guys decide. I d
Hi Andrei,
I have no idea. :-) It doesn't really affect me personally that I can think
of, so whatever you guys decide. I don't feel strongly either way... I
just wanted to bring up the internal changes originally after the locale
stuff created the bug with number_format() (maybe a couple other
So we should remove locale-awareness then?
-Andrei
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:15 AM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Andrei,
No, not really... :-) I agree with what you said. Even in
non-Unicode mode
or 5.2, it doesn't seem like making things locale aware which weren't
before
is a good idea (3rd party c
Hi Andrei,
No, not really... :-) I agree with what you said. Even in non-Unicode mode
or 5.2, it doesn't seem like making things locale aware which weren't before
is a good idea (3rd party code that's relying on behavior, etc. which I
think was mentioned elsewhere).
Matt
- Original Messa
Matt, any replies to this?
-A
On Dec 22, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Especially since POSIX locales are deprecated in Unicode mode. I
really don't think printf() should use locale-aware formatting by
default.
-Andrei
On Dec 22, 2006, at 5:42 AM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi all,
A
Especially since POSIX locales are deprecated in Unicode mode. I really
don't think printf() should use locale-aware formatting by default.
-Andrei
On Dec 22, 2006, at 5:42 AM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi all,
A couple questions regarding the printf changes (internal and
userland) a
couple weeks
Hi all,
A couple questions regarding the printf changes (internal and userland) a
couple weeks ago...
Now the internal %f, %g, and %G are locale-aware, which they weren't before,
right? Is this how they're supposed to be and simply weren't before? (The
locale changes caused Bug #39873 with numb
