Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread Jochem Maas
it may be worth noting that the percieved sentiment towards apache2 (as compared to apache) by the php 'crowd' (and others), is something that php5 may very well be suffering from itself: phpbb (if nothing else, a well known app in php-land) state in their changelog: running phpBB 2.0.x with

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread George Schlossnagle
I'd like to invite all the folks who have been posting in this thread who lament PHPs support (or partial lack there of) for Apache 2 to dig into the SAPI and improve it. Open source is driven by both personal interest and project momentum, and I'm sure if you all start contributing

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread Jochem Maas
Wez Furlong wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4117711.stm Not exactly a ringing endorsement ;-) lol. not at all surprising (I'm familiar with their code). but the point stands that php5 also gets unproductive coverage, and both camps working together make a much greater force against

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
Jochem Maas wrote: the point stands that php5 also gets unproductive coverage, and both camps working together make a much greater force against any FUD. Any new release that in some situations breaks backwards compatibility will get some negative press. Ultimately, in successful products a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread Paul G
- Original Message - From: Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: internals@lists.php.net Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:08 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we dont like PHP / PHPs anti-Apache2 FUD completely off-topic: I just love the way you can

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-22 Thread Wez Furlong
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4117711.stm Not exactly a ringing endorsement ;-) --Wez. On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 02:14:31 +0100, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: phpbb (if nothing else, a well known app in php-land) state in their changelog: running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not

[PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Via PlanetApache: - http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=843 - http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=844 Season's Greetings, Sebastian -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Nuno Lopes
Is the AddType stuff true? If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler.. Nuno - Original Message - From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:21 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Why we dont like PHP / PHPs anti-Apache2 FUD Via PlanetApache:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did this. Since AddType works with every version of Apache I never saw a reason to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti -Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Paul Reinheimer
I would personally consider Rich Bowen an authority on the subject, and as such trust what he is saying as true. paul On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:28:09 -, Nuno Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the AddType stuff true? If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler.. Nuno - Original