Try to use the language features that exist to implement your
functionality. If you find that you cannot do it, chances are that you're
trying to do something wrong, and not that the language is missing some
core feature.
Zeev
At 12:00 20/08/2003, Vesselin Atanasov wrote:
Hello.
Sorry for dou
Hello.
Sorry for double posting but I forgot to CC it to the mailing list.
Basically I need some special names to be available automatically
without the need to create them via new()
Some of them just like the database object will be singletons,
but some need a different copy in every symbol table
I don't see need for this magic. You can implement this using a simple
singleton pattern, if you need it. I don't think we want to add features
that will condone the use of globals, a singleton class is a much better
solution for that.
Zeev
At 06:10 20/08/2003, Vesselin Atanasov wrote:
Hello
Hello.
I think that it would be useful to allow an __autocreate() function create
non-existing
variables just like __autoload is called for non-existing classes. The
function will be
called when an attempt is made to read a non-existent variable. It will
return a reference
to the new variable it cr
