Hello,
Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
of adding a function to the Reflection extension which would parse
docBlocks according to a s
Am 16.09.2010 22:56, schrieb Chad Fulton:
> Hello,
>
> Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
> docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
>
> This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
> of adding a function to the Reflection
hi,
That's nice a nice idea. The PHPDocumentator guys did something to
help the parsing via a pecl's extension
(http://pecl.php.net/docblock). Now, to implement the docbloc parsing
itself will require a parser usage (lemon or whatever else you want),
it will be freaking tricky, not necessary fast
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:56:04 +0100, Chad Fulton
wrote:
Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
of adding a function to the Reflection e
Hello,
Yes, this is not an RFC for annotations or to replicate the exact
functionality you wanted within doc comments.
However, there is support based on the annotations thread for "APIs to
parse doc blocks". I don't know what is meant by others (Zeev, Stas,
etc) when they say this. However, in w
Hello!
That is a good point, there would be no file-level doc block in the
RFC. Here is my reasoning for not including it in the RFC:
Since the motivation for this came from the desire for metadata for
PHP structures, it seemed inappropriate to include metadata at the
file level (since it's not a
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Chad Fulton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
> docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
>
> This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
> of adding a function to th
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:56 -0700, Chad Fulton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
> docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
>
> This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but only with the idea
> of adding a function to t
On 2010-09-16, "Gustavo Lopes" wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:56:04 +0100, Chad Fulton
> wrote:
>
> > Based on comments from the annotations thread, I have created a
> > docBlock parser RFC at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser
> >
> > This RFC does not deal with annotations per se, but on
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:41:33 +0100, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
On 2010-09-16, "Gustavo Lopes" wrote:
Pointless.
Well, this will maybe speedup and standardize the usage of doc comments,
but it's very far from what we could do with real annotations.
Let's argue this one on its own meri
FWIW, I am in favour of something that allows the parsing of DocBlock comments
(should it just be DocBlock comments though?) and am implementation agnostic so
far (i have too little understanding of where in the core/extensions this would
need to sit).
This would then allow developers to hack o
11 matches
Mail list logo
