Lukas Kahwe Smith schreef:
On 10.07.2008, at 14:43, Richard Krehbiel wrote:
Here's the big part: I was thinking that a semantic change to persistent
sockets might make it easier for scripts to work "correctly" without
bothering them too much. The change is this: If a script doesn't
"fclose
On 10.07.2008, at 14:43, Richard Krehbiel wrote:
Here's the big part: I was thinking that a semantic change to
persistent
sockets might make it easier for scripts to work "correctly" without
bothering them too much. The change is this: If a script doesn't
"fclose"
it's "pfsockopen"ed soc
We are experiencing some problems with persistent sockets (the kind you get
from pfsockopen) and I can't help but conclude that some semantic changes
are needed to make them dependable. (That is, assuming anyone cares whether
they are dependable.)
The problem is that, in practice, a persistent so
