Hi,
I think it would be useful if require would throw an exception on failure.
Currently one would use @include in order to load in a file that could
be missing or could contain parse errors. However it is impossible to
easy find out if the file was missing, had parse errors or returned false.
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Lukas Smith wrote:
By throwing an exception inside require with the necessary information
it would be able to cleanly handle this situation without having to
silence this error and then parsing the error message. And it would
obviously be BC compatible as
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Lukas Smith wrote:
> I think it would be useful if require would throw an exception on failure.
NO! Internal functions do NOT throw exceptions, period.
> By throwing an exception inside require with the necessary information
> it would be able to cleanly handle this situation
Hehe, shut down Lukas.
I'd love to know why file_exists doesn't search the include path like every
other file function
"Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 8 May 2004, Lukas Smith wrote:
>
> > I think it would be useful if require would throw an
