Hi there,
On 7/26/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The php.ini file, on completion, needs to be copied to one with the relevant
SAPI name. In the case of Apache 1 only, php-apache.ini needs to be in the
toplevel Apache directory. In every other case (php-cli.ini,
php-cgi-fcgi.ini php-apa
John Mertic wrote:
Hi there,
On 7/26/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case of Apache 1 only, php-apache.ini needs to be in the
toplevel Apache directory. In every other case (php-cli.ini,
php-cgi-fcgi.ini php-apache2.ini, and
php-whatever-2.2-SAPI-is-called.ini)
it needs to be
Hi there,
On 7/26/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've offered this patch before to provide the PHPIniDir for the Apache 1.3
SAPI - no response. Are people interested in my reintroducing it?
If it's fairly low risk, why not. It would make this much easier.
What does e
Hi William,
John Mertic wrote:
Hi there,
On 7/26/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case of Apache 1 only, php-apache.ini needs to be in the
toplevel Apache directory. In every other case (php-cli.ini,
php-cgi-fcgi.ini php-apache2.ini, and
php-whatever-2.2-SAPI-is-called.ini)
it
Steph Fox wrote:
>
> It wouldn't make any difference to John, since he'd need to support
> older Apache installs for the installer anyway... apart from that,
> it's got my vote!
>
Sure it would. PHPIniDir is apache directive provided by php's
sapi/apache2*. Adding it to sapi/apache would make it un
Steph Fox wrote:
It wouldn't make any difference to John, since he'd need to support
older Apache installs for the installer anyway... apart from that,
it's got my vote!
Sure it would. PHPIniDir is apache directive provided by php's
sapi/apache2*. Adding it to sapi/apache would make it univers
Given that there is significant interest, and no objection, I'll
commit this later today. Are any of trunk / 5.2 or 4.4 branches
frozen right now?
Bill
Steph Fox wrote:
Steph Fox wrote:
It wouldn't make any difference to John, since he'd need to support
older Apache installs for the instal
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Given that there is significant interest, and no objection, I'll
> commit this later today. Are any of trunk / 5.2 or 4.4 branches
> frozen right now?
You can't add it to the 4.4 branch now, you'll have to wait until after
the 4.4.3 release.
r
