Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joe Orton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on x86-{freebsd,linux}
> I believe that there was an all around agreement a
I believe that there was an all around agreement and this and given that
we are nearing release of 5.0.3 and 4.3.10 this would be a perfect
opportunity to do it. Otherwise it'll need wait for unknown number of
months till the next release.
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Dec 7, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Did we ever came to the conclusion whether we should put this patch
into
CVS. AFAIK everybody agreed with it...
That's what I recall as well.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 06:31:56AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > There is already a --without-pic/--with-pic flag that just doesn't work.
> > I'd key it off of that.
>
> It doesn't work because PHP prevents AC_PROG_LIBTOOL from interpreting
> it by do
Makes sense to me.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 06:31:56AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > > > The point is that the current behaviour needs
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 06:31:56AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > > The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained
> > > for installations which would be negativel
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> All shared extensions (mysql,...) should be DSO, because they can be used by
> different Web Server modules and CLI PHP.
This is still a memory vs. performance issue. In my case I definitely
would prefer the performance, so I am not so sure that this ho
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on
> x86-{freebsd,linux}
>
>
> So we should enable pic automatically when the embed SAPI is
> selected; otherwise we are safe to go for non-pic, correct?
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Thu, 16 Se
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained
> > for installations which would be negatively affected by your
> > patch. Building non-PIC as default is ok, if a
So we should enable pic automatically when the embed SAPI is selected;
otherwise we are safe to go for non-pic, correct?
--Wez.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:07:42 +0200 (CEST), Sascha Schumann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
>
> > Something like this sounds right:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
Something like this sounds right:
--enable-slow-pic Build a slower DSO that can be used to run multiple
concurrent Apache instances. You don't
need this unless
you know why you need it.
Which g
Something like this sounds right:
--enable-slow-pic Build a slower DSO that can be used to run multiple
concurrent Apache instances. You don't
need this unless
you know why you need it.
Which gets me thinking... how does this aff
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> The point is that the current behaviour needs to be retained
> for installations which would be negatively affected by your
> patch. Building non-PIC as default is ok, if a switch is
> provided to build PIC.
Ah, go
My understanding is that a single DSO on disk can be "shared" between
two instances, but the text sections of such will not be shared in
physical RAM between two instances which load it, because the code will
get fixed up and hence copied-on-write. Is that not the case?
That is the correct und
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:53:40AM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> >This is Rasmus' patch but only enabled on platforms where it's known to
> >work. Applies to HEAD: the apache2handler SAPI builds and loads a
> >shared extension OK like this on Linux/i686.
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
This is Rasmus' patch but only enabled on platforms where it's known to
work. Applies to HEAD: the apache2handler SAPI builds and loads a
shared extension OK like this on Linux/i686. It looks like some people
preferred a configure flag for this and some prefe
16 matches
Mail list logo
