Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
And my stance hasn't changed either:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117060700805108&w=2
...
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (option b)
--
Tullio Andreatta
09:f9:11:02:9d:74:e3:5b:d8:41:56:c5:63:56:88:c0
45:5f:e1:04:22:ca:29:c4:93:3f:95:05:2b:79:2a:b2
Disclaimer: "Please treat this email message in a reasonable way, or we
might get angry" ( http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers )
--
PHP Internals - P
On Jan 11, 2008 10:30 AM, Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1
>
> Readability degrades quite a lot.
+1 (b)
Readability will only degrade as much as the coder allows it to.
Besides, I don't get the impression that array() is going to
disappear, only that another option is to be
-1
Readability degrades quite a lot.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (b)
Regards,
--
KUBO Atsuhiro e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (b)
If you think foo([]) is not readable, it's simple... don't use it.
Also, JS defines this since its begining and none until today said it
is not readable.
Regards,
On Jan 11, 2008 11:19 AM, Ford, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for (b) FWIW
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike
>
> -
+1 for (b) FWIW
Cheers!
Mike
-
Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser,
JG125, The Headingley Library,
James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Email:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:51:51 -0800, "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andi 2003:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg03896.html
>
>
>
> Andi's brain evolves 2007:
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117057393530217&w=2
>
>
>
> And today I'm still +1.
>
>
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:05 +0200, Lokrain wrote:
> Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
>
> So as if I understand, you want to change the syntax of array() keyword.
> Will you mind to update the changes in all php scripts in the world too?
>
> PS. You can always have your [] in custom patch, but I do not
+1
--
Ryusuke SEKIYAMA
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 13:18 +0100, Pierre wrote:
> +1 (for the record in this thread :)
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>
--
Patches/Donations: http://pecl.php.net/~jani/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
+1
--
Mark Dennehy
+1
Best regards
Stephan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
Now, back to lurking...
==
Richard Black - Senior Consultant
DataVisibility Ltd
Tel. 020 7917 9570
http://www.datavisibility.com/
Registered Office: 212 Picc
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Pierre wrote:
+1 (for the record in this thread :)
-1
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 (for the record in this thread :)
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Antonio Touriño wrote:
> The array() syntax to me screams function call, something that,
You mean just like if(), for(), while(), foreach(), elseif() and... ?
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP I
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I think almost everyone here agreed it'd benefit them and maybe the ones
> who don't would go through the same process I went through once they get
> used to it J
I don't know about that, I for once find it silly to even try to argue
that [] is a good i
It is not about changing, it is about adding a different way to declare
arrays (the function-style way will remain). The current code base will be
unaffected.
+1 vote from me to add ['x'=>'y']
On Jan 11, 2008 10:05 AM, Lokrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
>
> So as if
Hello mr. Antonio Touriño,
So as if I understand, you want to change the syntax of array() keyword.
Will you mind to update the changes in all php scripts in the world too?
PS. You can always have your [] in custom patch, but I do not think
it's useful to want it globally changed.
Hello all,
The array() syntax to me screams function call, something that, in my
mind, did not intuitively mean assign an array to a plain ole
variable.
If I can:
$var1 = 5;
why would I need a special function call "array()" to create and
assign an array?
An array is just like any other variab
And my stance hasn't changed either:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117060700805108&w=2
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Andi 2003:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg03896.html
Andi's brain evolves 2007:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=117057393530217&w=2
And today I'
25 matches
Mail list logo