RE: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-27 Thread Andi Gutmans
I think we're still far away from a working garbage collector which is production quality. At least last time we were discussing it. This should still remain a PHP 6 item if we can actually make it works in an acceptable way. Andi > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-28 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I think we're still far away from a working garbage collector which is > production quality. At least last time we were discussing it. This > should still remain a PHP 6 item if we can actually make it works in an > acceptable way. Have you checked the l

Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-28 Thread Cristian Rodriguez
On 8/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we're still far away from a working garbage collector which is > production quality. Im sure it has bugs, but last time I tested the "circular" repository it was working really fine and the save of memory was really big ;-) -- http:/

Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-29 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:46 -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote: > On 8/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we're still far away from a working garbage collector which is > > production quality. > > Im sure it has bugs, but last time I tested the "circular" repository > it was w

RE: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-29 Thread Andi Gutmans
8 AM > To: Cristian Rodriguez > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? > > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:46 -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote: > > On 8/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think we're still fa

RE: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3?

2007-08-29 Thread Andi Gutmans
Sebastian, Just so you guys don't get the wrong idea, I have a garbage collector book sitting on my shelf which I bought 2-3 years ago as I was thinking of implementing this. Unfortunately I hit some issues and edge cases and didn't have enough time to spend on this. So I'm definitely not against a