On 7/11/2014 3:20 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
>> +int iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned int iova,
>> +struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned int len, int prot)
>> +{
>> +if (unlikely(domain->ops->map_range
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:14:05PM +0100, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:45 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:38:18PM +0100, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:34 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > Do you think that returning something lik
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:57:31AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> [...]
>> > The way that Thierry's binding does that is the obvious solution to this,
>> > and it mirrors what we do in pra
Hi Thierry,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:44:53AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:43:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > My plan for the ARM SMMU driver is:
> >
> > (1) Change ->probe() to walk the device-tree looking for all masters with
> > phandles back to the SMM
Hi Laurent,
On 7/14/2014 6:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2014 09:19:23 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
>> On 7/10/2014 7:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 July 2014 09:03:26 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
On 5/15/2014 7:40 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Cache the micro-TLB nu
Hi Khiem,
On Monday 14 July 2014 09:19:23 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
> On 7/10/2014 7:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 July 2014 09:03:26 Khiem Nguyen wrote:
> >> On 5/15/2014 7:40 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Cache the micro-TLB number in archdata allocated in the .add_device
> >>>
