Hi Joerg,
Ping ?
On Monday 15 December 2014 20:41:13 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> From: Laurent Pinchart
>
> Commit a720b41c41f5a7e4 ("iommu/arm-smmu: change IOMMU_EXEC to
> IOMMU_NOEXEC") has inverted and replaced the IOMMU_EXEC flag with
> IOMMU_NOEXEC. Update the driver accordingly.
>
> Signed
This patch adds a new exported function to amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if the
amd_iommu_v2 initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise.
This is necessary for the case when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled inside the kernel
image (not as module) and another module (e.g. amdkfd), which is also
On 12/20/2014 10:12 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> This patch adds a new exported function to amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if
> the
> amd_iommu_v2 initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise.
>
> This is necessary for the case when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled inside the kernel
> image (not a
Hi Kevin,
On Friday 19 December 2014 03:27:35 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:28:58 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
>
> [cut]
>
> It would be better to be able to reference count the DMA engine from
> the bus master IMO and arguably you can use the r
On 20/12/2014 00:48, Wu, Feng wrote:
> In my understanding, lowest priority interrupts are always delivered to a
> Single CPU, we need to find the right destination CPU from the cpumask.
Yes, but which CPU however differs every time the interrupt is
delivered. So the emulation here is a bit poo
