Hi Robin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.mur...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 16:51
> To: Nipun Gupta ; will.dea...@arm.com; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: Stuart Yoder
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu:
We seem to have forgotten to check that iommu_fwspecs actually belong to
us before we go ahead and dereference their private data. Oops.
Fixes: 021bb8420d44 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Wire up generic configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed,
Hi Robin,
On 24/10/2016 21:39, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 21/10/16 10:26, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> On 20/10/2016 19:32, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Thanks for posting this.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:22:08PM +, Eric Auger wrote:
This is the second respin on top
Hi Nipun,
On 02/11/16 13:35, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> The SMTNMB_TLBEN in the Auxiliary Configuration Register (ACR) provides an
> option to enable the updation of TLB in case of bypass transactions due to
> no stream match in the stream match table. This reduces the latencies of
> the subsequent tran
The SMTNMB_TLBEN in the Auxiliary Configuration Register (ACR) provides an
option to enable the updation of TLB in case of bypass transactions due to
no stream match in the stream match table. This reduces the latencies of
the subsequent transactions with the same stream-id which bypasses the SMMU.
Hi Lorenzo,
>-Original Message-
>From: linux-arm-msm-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-arm-msm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Pieralisi
>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 4:19 PM
>To: Sricharan
>Cc: 'Robin Murphy' ; will.dea...@arm.com;
>j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux
