Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: switch the VIA 32-bit DMA quirk to use the struct device flag

2018-05-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:23:35AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > They remove the commandline switch before having the replacement in place > > > unless I'm misreading something. > > > > The command line switch to force 32-bit dma is removed without > > replacement. The PCI quirk for force

Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: switch the VIA 32-bit DMA quirk to use the struct device flag

2018-05-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:23:35AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > They remove the commandline switch before having the replacement in > > > > place > > > > unless I'm misreading something. > > > > > > The command line switch to force 32-bit d

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] get rid of GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD

2018-05-28 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 25-05-18 05:00:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > ie if we had more, > > > could we solve our pain by making them more generic? > > > > Well, if you have more you will consume more bits in the struct pages, > > right? > > Not nec

Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] get rid of GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD

2018-05-28 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 25-05-18 09:43:09, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote: > From: Michal Hocko [mailto:mho...@kernel.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 8:19 PM> > > > Let me try to reply your questions. > > > Exactly, GFP_ZONE_TABLE is too complicated. I think there are two > > > advantages > > > from the series of pat